InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 6112
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/05/2017

Re: overachiever post# 162310

Saturday, 11/11/2017 2:17:21 PM

Saturday, November 11, 2017 2:17:21 PM

Post# of 165855
"Scott came on at .0005 and left at .02. Not bad. But maybe if things had gone his way could have been better ....Dan came on at .02 and now the stock is basically averaging .005. Not positive at all."

Yeah, overachiever, Scott at (.0005 to.02)moved the stock 40 times or 4,000 per cent higher and Mr. Byrnes led the stock (.02 to .005) 75% lower!!

There really is no debate among reasonable, rational folks on whom was the more successful SRSR CEO.

It is a quite simple equation,apples to apples comparison; most shareholders know that Scott's SRSR tenure greatly overshadows Dan's disastrous leadership; however, there is a small,loud, angry, bitter, misinformed bunch whom cannot, obviously, handle the truth.

It is analogous to leading a thirsty horse to water: if the horse refuses to drink one can safely assume that that particular horse is intellectually challenged....

In my opinion.