Friday, November 10, 2017 12:21:49 PM
I get the impression you are not very familiar with the 351k process. It's not like 505j or 505b2 where a simple PK can act as a bridging study. Let me just say, it's much much more complicated.
I think part of the problem may be that SPPI themselves do not understand the complexity. The patent dance needed to allow biggy-backing existing GCSF data is a labyrinth and SPPI (especially their CMC group) has absolutely no bandwidth to support this. It's like little Timmy dreaming about going to the moon with his toy Saturn rocket..
Recent SPPI News
- Form 15-12G - Securities registration termination [Section 12(g)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/09/2023 10:00:17 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/28/2023 04:15:27 AM
- Form S-8 POS - Securities to be offered to employees in employee benefit plans, post-effective amendments • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/26/2023 09:23:08 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM