InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 865
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2017

Re: trding post# 18093

Friday, 11/10/2017 11:02:37 AM

Friday, November 10, 2017 11:02:37 AM

Post# of 232084
Actually, it was the opposite. The rationale was that 30 would give statistical significance, but not clinical significance. That's a BS answer, because they would/should have known the number they (FDA) would need up front for either. Something changed in the ask - from one side or the other - in my opinion.

And again, the data was still blinded, so there's no way that the FDA looked at the data and decided they needed more.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CYDY News