Speaking of one of the masters of "false facts" (closely related to fake news), who said:
"Something to think about to those suggesting price says everything:"??
I haven't said that and I haven't seen anyone else say that. Thanks for the continuous stream of documenting the examples of "false facts".
That said, there is no doubt to anyone with even the most elementary knowledge of how this market (which isn't really even a true market) works, it is certainly & undoubtedly true that price, when coupled with a 5 yr old trend down, is most certainly a significant & important factor to consider. Maybe there are some other "market geniuses" out there who would corroborate that a near 5 yrs down trend, in a pennystock with no income & no money, who cannot garner any recognition or respect in the industry it resides in, nor make a sale, nor sell any licenses, and prints close to, if not the, lowest price in 57 mos, is NOT IMPORTANT. Could some experienced stock market person kindly corroborate that. I would appreciate it & love to see it. No wishy washy please. No twisting of words please. I included the clearly delineated prerequisites that go along with the price, with which I arrive at the determination of the 2 cent price reached as being significant, pertinent & important. Looking for corroboration that is not true. Also enlightening, would be anyone who might agree w/my explained, qualified point.
While we're at it, I would also ask if anyone else thinks or agrees that in the specific case of vplm & it's current situation, that the VWAP and "NIT W" are indeed an important metric of vplm daily price? Thanks in advance for your thoughts/opinions.