InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112680
Next 10
Followers 34
Posts 14210
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/27/2014

Re: HeedTheChief post# 90334

Wednesday, 11/08/2017 4:16:41 PM

Wednesday, November 08, 2017 4:16:41 PM

Post# of 112680
MCIG's Public tweet could be another Lie

That's, again, what you're missing. And it has nothing to do with me. It DOES HAVE TO DO WITH MCIG'S TREATMENT OF ITS SHAREHOLDERS. MCIG owes the truth and to be transparent to its shareholders. They have failed to do so.

Plus, that $2.3 mil/month is not a chip in play at all. No verifiable land, no MJ cultivation licenses in CA. They've generated exactly $0 in mj revenues.

Again, the tweet is NOT VERIFIABLE FOR ANY SHAREHOLDER.

MCIG's MO is to lie and mislead. This is another example.

Why are you not disclosing on every post?



The only relevant verifiable fact is that MCIG Kern County Boards ruling regarding cannabis has zero affect on MCIG's land in California City.

How is that a 0 chips in play?
That chip is estimated to bring in about $2.4 million in revenues
per month at full capacity.

Nice!

Now you want to know specifically where in California City, well, that information also will be released, just not today, and not directly to
you, lol.
~Heed intentionally misleading everyone AGAIN