InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 7306
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/08/2002

Re: bliz82 post# 97713

Tuesday, 09/26/2006 4:01:20 PM

Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:01:20 PM

Post# of 311057
I can't answer for others. I spoke to 3 different offices. I even got the names of the KPMG CPAs who did the work for Sulja 3 years ago and confirmed this with another office. Perhaps I am more persuasive, but that is a fact, and that is why I sold. I know there must be "bashers" who bet against stocks and therefore talk them down, but I am not one of them. On the other hand, I also know there are the opposite of bashers who ask people to blindly ignore red flags and claim anyone saying anything perceived as negative is a basher and not to be trusted. I understand this too. When you have your own hard-earned money in something, you do not want anything to negatively affect that. All I can say is, if anyone says the information I gave is false or made-up in ANY way, they are 100% lying or just don't know and are saying what makes them feel better. The only thing I have read which could be a legitimate excuse for this ONE issue is if a private company held SLJB and that is where the audit is, but I find that highly unlikely because of how clear and precise they were about when they did work for Sulja in the past and how definite they were about them not being a client now. I guess the truth will come out soon.

I remain,

SOROS