InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112680
Next 10
Followers 166
Posts 10466
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2012

Re: BubbaInSC post# 90199

Thursday, 11/02/2017 8:54:28 PM

Thursday, November 02, 2017 8:54:28 PM

Post# of 112680
Re-read your own post.

I was specifically responding to your suggestive comment that
the land is in a banned area, and had nothing to do with where
the land was.

So the Tweet is actually, NOT IRRELEVANT, as you claim, because it supports my premise.

I was clearly responding to your suggestive comment in Post #90194

Quote,

"whether the land is in a banned area"

MCIG already released a statement on social media stating the land is in fact, NOT, in a banned area:

$MCIG Update!

$MCIG in the clear regarding recent vote by Kern county board. Our land falls outside set ban.
Full steam ahead!!!




You also stated,

Quote,

"MCIG is intentionally NOT divulging the land to buy them time
and to bait MJ."

I would love to see the source and proof for your claim.

To re-repeat the, FACTS, MCIG didn't release the
specific land area after the Kern county ruling for the same
reason they didn't release the specifics before the Kern
county ruling.

For strategic and competitive reasons, and will disclose the
specific land area in the near future.