InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 2974
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/23/2017

Re: CryptoCells post# 7786

Tuesday, 10/31/2017 6:16:39 AM

Tuesday, October 31, 2017 6:16:39 AM

Post# of 44784
Of course by them owning 8 million shares, half being gifted while we get shafted, would make them want this company to be successful. The BIG question is, does owning 8 million shares mean they know how to run this type of business. An emphatic NO!!!!

Impatiently shortsighted??? Seven years impatiently shortsighted. Don't think so. Seven years burned is what I would call it. This was our "promised year" but by the looks of it, just call me impatiently shortsighted for 8 years.

So let me ask you a few questions about some of their amazing business prowess.

Do you think this Sosei deal was a good one? $11 million to start up Newco. Give up 70%. Is this the sort of deal that others should be worried about. Or do you think they kind of get laughed at now when they ask for an actual real partnership should go for.

And how about the 2 year delay and counting, getting this Japanese fast track thing going. What's the point of bragging about it if you can't get it started. Fast track....sure

Do you think it was a good idea to let the government pay for doing their trials, or would you rather have had them get a $50-$300 MILLION developmental contract like others in the ARS space did. I would definitely call that one, SHORTSIGHTED!!! Now finally, you're going to come back and ask for $50 million. Is the government playing hardball with the twins? Possibly. Something's going on as it's been 4 months since dosing trial's been done.

Do you think we would have needed to do three dilutions in "our" year of they had gotten this contract. I think if they were ever awarded that contract, our share price would be significantly higher. The kind that would make ONE raise, less diluting and affording the company several years of cash, rather than less than half a year.

Do you think a company with limited amounts of cash, should have 2 CEO's, cut from the same Elbit Vision System cloth, earning what, half a million each? Idiotic and a little nepotistic don't you think? Half a million a year that decision has cost us. Has it done anything to further us along. Embarrassing is the way I see it. Hey Mr. CEO. I know there's only one of you and two of us. I don't know how you can run a company all by yourself. Let's negotiate. Twins is the most fitting nickname ever given. Lmao.

Do you think having the same share price as seven years ago is something we should all be happy with?

Do you think they DESERVED to get that 2 million share bonus, essentially doubling the number of shares they own. Don't you think that puts a sour face on the shareholders of this company, and others looking in from the outside. And to have the board not look at other companies in giving out this gift was pure genius. Then the next quarter, when there was nothing of relevance to this issue, they magically do. Laughable. More nepotism going on there,,,,no way...couldn't be...could it? Did we get a partnership from it. Nope. Did we get a contract from it? Nope. Was it deserving for any sort of accomplishment they achieved? Nope. Did we get a significantly higher share price from it? Hell no!!!!

I gave an example of Sangamo recently, where they revamped management with all but the CFO having vast pharma industry experience. A quadruple in share price, the following year. Now scroll through our management's bio's and see their experience. Polar opposite. Do you think they should have hired more from Elbit Vision Systems plethora of employees (we have 3 in management alone) or should we have hired employees with vast PHARMACEUTICAL experience?

So please answer my questions. Not just a general overview of my apparent impatiently shortsighted views, but YOUR view on the EXACT topics I brought up.

How people could keep standing up for these twins is beyond me. Like I said before, love blinds I guess. LMAOx1000

Run Lovers Run