Thursday, October 26, 2017 8:27:37 PM
I like your American football analogy and I agree with Medivir "carrying the ball". But that doesn't translate to ensuring Medivir pays stakeholders when they score a TD on 4th and goal. This is a heck of a lot of money and my point is very simple: WHO IS PROTECTING STAKEHOLDERS INTERESTS?
What's better for Medivir, paying out one billion in milestone and royalty payments or paying out $100million?
So as shareholders, should be just stand by and accept what ever Medivir comes back to us with? I should think not!
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM