Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

434175

re the catch 22 related to judicial castration clause - 4617 f - it is there on paper but we see how judges have responded

As I read it all courts have said 4617 f ties their hands and have granted motions to dismiss based on this clause (i.e. no hearing of the arguments) . By inference those judges have found the solution to the Catch 22 is to grant a motion to dismiss

One judge (not court) has found strongly that there is no barrier as the actions were illegal

Sweeny is in the middle

Sweeny has not ruled on GOV motion to dismiss
Sweeny instead agreed with plaintiffs arguments that without discovery the judge could not determine if 4617 f