Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[keep_trying]

Jake, by the "sleaze" rationale, it can be noted that the Chancellery Court imposed a discipline on PPHM board compensation that reined compensation in. Seventy-five percent of peer company Board compensation is not as much a constraint as some wanted to see, of course. So is PPHM complying with the Court's BOD compensation restriction a resolution for the sleaze perception?

Also, looking back to the CSM patient dosing material mislabeling, that is a big "sleaze" indicator that does not appear to have been reconciled, at least not if one presumes that the CSM staffer was acting on behalf of a third party who was seeking financial benefit through the encumbrance of PPHM trial success. If one believes the CSM staffer(s) actions were a simple mistake, that matter can be considered resolved for sleaze factor too. The Court facilitated a settlement and the records were sealed, so PPHM investors cannot know.

Best wishes and IMO.
KT