Therealdeal thinks that it is good that Our-Street posts negative speculation on companies, thus driving the PPS down considerably leaving many with 50 - 80% losses in a matter of a trading day?
Even if a company on Our-Street's site is a lemon, the market can decide that over time and as FACTS come out. Not a crash due to negative speculation.
Artificially depressing a PPS overnight is an immoral practice and is used for an agenda. Therealdeal believes this is "good"?
Hey, therealdeal, do you think Our-Street is doing "good" by posting a fake Cease and Desist letter? What do you think about Roddy Boyd's lawyer telling him to be quite on the subject of CSHD after talking about the C&D? I've already proven an ID on HSM as being fake as he was claiming to use AOL accounts... one of which belonging to me. Is that "good" in your opinion that there are liars out there touting what you think is "factual" negative speculation?
In light of the fact there is heavy shorting going on with CSHD and probably NSS, do you agree that there may be an agenda going on?
I know many bashers have said in the lines that Rufus's silence on matters is telling. In your opinion, do you think that is true for Our-Street or Roddy Boyd? What about stocklemon? Why, in your opinion, do you believe they stopped posting and writing articles on CSHD if it were the slam dunk you suggest it is.
On 144's, do you post to MSFT investors that they should sell because those shareholders are selling some MSFT for profit? If not, why do you think it's "OK" for MSFT shareholders to sell for profit but CSHD holders wanting to sell for profit is somehow an indicator that the company is going no where?
It is one thing to get banned for posing an opposite opinion based on facts. It's another to get banned for trying to wrap investors around an axle that you know to be common amongst all stocks... that being... shareholders from time to time DO sell for liquidity's sake no matter what the future speculation is.
AI
