Friday, October 13, 2017 8:07:02 AM
While a disclaimer or some such language may be commonplace in some types of agreements or announcements, there are two aspects in this case that are unusual.
1) We learned that Darkpulse issued a Purchase Order to BVTK BEFORE it had completed negotiations and closed a deal with its client. That is unusual. It makes far more sense for Darkpulse to conclude its deal and then issue Purchase Orders or subcontracts against that.
2) And if we are talking about "typical" disclaimers, then why wasn't the disclaimer in the original 8K? Why did they decide (or feel the need) to include it after the fact in a subsequent PR?
It is hard to avoid the conclusion that they rushed this PR out prematurely.
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM