Good evening/morning fellow board members/lurkers. Seems there has been an enormous amount of activity on the board! Consternation, speculation, supposition, allegations, personal attacks, violence, constitutional rights, sex; it would make for a great novel!
While I’m disappointed we did not receive the audited financials today, that does not necessarily mean they were not produced (IMHO). You see, we simply don’t know (no evidence to the contrary for either position that I have been made aware of). Therefore, might I suggest, everyone standup, back away from their keyboards slowly, take a deep breath, and break this mob frenzy mentality for a just a little while. LOL!!
When I became a member of this board, my expectation(s) were that I would share with other board members VALIDATED AND OBJECTIVE information/data (AKA evidence) related to the subject at hand, specifically, Sulja Bros. Granted, much can be learned from the vast experience of several board members, and their contributions to this board are very valuable; as long as everyone accepts that prior experiences have subjective perspectives, and conclusions based on prior experiences are generally historical in nature, and respectfully, only qualify as OPINION. Not that there is anything wrong with stating one’s opinion(s), as long as we, the collective board, clarify that such postings are opinions, born from prior experiences. Much has been posted on the board regarding the current situation (lack of audited financials). Most of those postings are antidotal in nature.
If a member does not subscribe to your ideology, or happen to agree with your perspective or supposition, it does not necessarily qualify them as a basher/pumper. It may mean they simply come to this experience with a different personal history, which creates their frame of reference and perspective (i.e. vast differences in direct witness testimony/statements from individuals witnessing identical events).
Now, this is very different from data that can be validated independently (empirical in nature) which, generally, is not open for debate. Most of the posting on this board are not empirical in nature, and are completely subjective. For those of you who find it necessary to attack others simply because they disagree with your postings, one could argue that you either do not have the intellectual capacity to defend your position, possess the facts to defend your position, or possess the emotional maturity to respond in a respectful manner. Therefore, you resort to personal attacks; which generally speaking, are an indicator of the aforementioned issues and thereby demonstrate the weakness of your hypothesis.
Regarding Green and his moderation of this board, I agree with the general consensus of the board, and believe he has performed admirably. My request to the members of this board is, if you can’t act in a civil manner, please leave or refrain from posting. There are many members on this board who would like to remain on topic, share validated DD, exchange in rational and intelligent ideas, tell a few good jokes, and possibly learn something. IMHO.
Regards,
4Justice.
Be true to your work, your word, and your friend
