InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1427
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2016

Re: AngeloFoca post# 30563

Thursday, 10/12/2017 8:11:07 AM

Thursday, October 12, 2017 8:11:07 AM

Post# of 38634
Angelo, I agree. IT is not a bad thing to add to another product as an NDA-S. My point was it also appears that they intend to abandon it with adding it to Rexista. Now is this being done because the money wasn't there from prospective partner? I do not know. Is it because Rexista is so far off it now would put adding it to that so far back? I do not know. all I do know is as you read the PR's, and the disclaimers Podras is no longer being mentioned along with Rexista. And that my friend is a problem. The Company even put out PR's stating Rexista enhanced with Podras got fast track status and do you recall what happened? Everyone is assuming this partnership for Rexista is going to be a block buster because it will contain the option for Podras to be added. Now when it doesn't what will happen? All I know is, when the time is right I will be getting to the bottom of this question. but for now, I do not believe the company intends to add Podras with Rexista any longer.

Honestly, who knows anything any longer with the way the company PR's. they put out a financial stating they have cash to last until,December and intend to bridge any shortfalls with the ATM and the very next day the dilute with an offering. Its been a bad historical practice on their part. That PR they put out a few years back stating they got fast track status confused everyone. I know a lot of people here felt Rexista was going to be fast tracked and were shocked when it went standard.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPCI News