InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1483
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/11/2013

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/10/2017 3:43:54 AM

Tuesday, October 10, 2017 3:43:54 AM

Post# of 38634
On the CASH needs

guys, here my conclusive points, which I'm not trying to convince anyone they are absolutely right or better than...I'm not writing anymore on this subject. By exeprience, I know anything thought illogical (to an investor) can Always materialize.

The thesis that the new CFO is more likely to push for a new shares issue it is by itself weak:

1- Odidi deicdes if/when

2- for sure the subject was discussed between the two during the hiring process/within the given mandate; "mr Patient, this is out of your scope, please find other ways or that is the door"

3- in the PR it was deliberately included that he "implemented a low-cost operating model". To me there is a hidden message here, although I wouldn't bet much on that

4- I have the felling that the previous raise was pushed by Della Penna; we all know how badly the stock behaviour was affected since. Now I don't see Odidi being convinced again to do something similar

5- one or maybe the only one positive aspect of having Odidi as the first shareholder is that his interests are or should be aligned with ours (shareholders). There is a multitude of small caps that have an history of recurring new raises: usually their management doesn't even have a single share of the stock. So mr Patient could likely want a big new raise to live his future without stress, but does Odidi ?

6- a new raise now will likely assimilate IPCI to those set of companies which are trying to expand their market cap via shares number increase instead of shares appreciation = investors stay away
(CTIC is a good example, ELTP another one, although very different from each other)
7- as I stated many times: a) Mallinckrodt or Purdue or whoever partners with IPCI, subsribes new 15mln shares and pays for new studies etc...yesss, I would strongly agree = trasnformational change in progress b) IPCI sells new shares to an hedge fund or the like...then even 5 mln shares will mean a new valley of pain begins

if IPCI decides to go for route b) then I believe I will strongly consder to close my Investments here.