InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 89
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2017

Re: nyt post# 42233

Saturday, 10/07/2017 2:20:22 AM

Saturday, October 07, 2017 2:20:22 AM

Post# of 130746
The infringing companies don't have to steal the implementation of the technology to infringe on the patent.

If I own a patent involving widgets, then the patent could be as much about the process of making or implementing the widget. It doesn't have to be a physical thing.

In VPLM case, for instance, the function to consider, decipher and operate upon additional caller context data to decide routing of a call to external network, for a given call, seems like a patentable idea that would not require the infringers to steal actual code which implemented said patent.

I am not an attorney.
I am not a patent expert.
I do have much software expertise.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News