InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 709
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/20/2011

Re: art35 post# 126170

Wednesday, 10/04/2017 9:21:50 PM

Wednesday, October 04, 2017 9:21:50 PM

Post# of 207155
By him putting assets into this shell when there are already shareholders he is giving some of his assets away because he will no longer own 100% of it anymore. She he is essentially giving away free assets to the already 4000 shareholders. Why would he not just keep everything private and keep 100%? Put it in llc and take some of the risk off of himself? And for him to make any money he is going to have to sell his shares, and what will that do to the price?

Private and public companies can have toxic debt or debt in general. Why not roll the debt into this shell and release shares to lucky persons like yourself to help pay it off?