From the otherr VHC board:
Text of Pacer Listing
I'll copy the text of the Pacer entries and Final Judgement Document below in case you can only see text and want the exact wording.
I would like to hear from the Litigators that post here (like Virnexcellence) on what type of information would be confidential in this order and subject to redaction. My daydream/homerun scenario would greatly increased damaged based on Apple's bad faith actions and a wink toward an injunction, with the next two weeks a clear signal to Apple that it has to reach a settlement or see a significant amount of dirty laundry aired in public. But I'd like to hear from the attorneys here.
Also note that the Final Judgement will be released no later than October 13th once the parties agree, but it may be sooner.
Date Filed # Docket Text
09/29/2017 1080 ORDER denying as moot 1004 Sealed Motion; denying as moot 1060 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/29/17. (mjc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
09/29/2017 1081 ORDER for the parties to file a joint sealed motion by 10/6/2017 to redact limited portions of the Court's Order entered this date on the pending post-trial motions. The Court plans to file an unsealed version of the Order no later than 10/13/2017. The motion shall also attach the Court's post-trial Order with the proposed redactions. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/29/17. (mjc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
09/29/2017 1082 FINAL JUDGMENT ENTERED. Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, the Court hereby ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT as to thiscase. All remaining pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/29/17. (mjc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
ORDER
On this date, the Court entered its Order on the pending post-trial motions under seal. To maintain the general public policies favoring disclosure of court records, the Court plans to file an unsealed version no later than October 13, 2017. Following a meet and confer, the parties may file a joint sealed motion to redact limited portions of the order no later than October 6, 2017. The parties shall request as few redactions as possible and provide “sufficiently compelling reasons that override the public policies favoring disclosure.”
The motion shall also attach the Court’s post-trial Order with the proposed redactions. .
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
FINAL JUDGMENT
The above-entitled civil action has come before the Court for consideration, and a decision has been duly rendered as to all claims. Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered this date, the Court hereby ENTERS FINAL JUDGMENT as to this case. All remaining pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VIRNETX INC. and SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, vs. APPLE INC., Defendant. § § § § § § CAUSE NO. 6:10-CV-417
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EDIT: This is the 855 text on Apple IV:
Date Filed # Docket Text
09/29/2017 527 ORDER denying 518 Motion to Stay. A memorandum opinion will follow. Parties are to meet and confer and file a joint motion with a proposed trial date by 10/13/2017. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/29/17. (mjc, ) (Entered: 09/29/2017)
