Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

It's a pump and dump. Kyle has never......

corrected false statements made in the past, and I don't think he ever intends to. At best they misled shareholders and the court. That's well documented. The fact false statements weren't corrected makes it look very intentional. It took them a year to correct SEC reports, but I still say it should have been via amended reports.

Besides, Florida is too restrictive to operate. It's doubtful they'll ever get a recovery permit. Even the simple things like submitting daily logs or competent quarterly and annual reports appear to be too much for Seafarer's to handle.

And most everything the Defendant was saying has turned out to be true. He said there was no 80/20 agreement and after reaching out to the BAR to back his claims and posting an email from Roger in which Mary was copied, Kyle went to extraordinary lengths in an attempt to take away his First Amendment rights. Heck, Kyle/Craig even wanted him jailed and a lender was cheering it on.

What is it they say about karma?

Yes I agree, very unprofessional. The BAR has even said as much. How much have they spent (ahem) defending their honor?

73. Between August 7, 2014 through August 29, 2014, XXXX posted under the alias name of XXXX that SEAFARER was involved in the illicit, nefarious activity and conducted itself in a manner which was lacking in any professional skill or know ledge in regard to its selection of recovery sites or its operations.

74. SEAFARER employs and consults with some of the most renowned experts in archaeology, as well as expert salvage divers and experts for its operations. The qualification of such persons is above reproach, yet XXXX did no research or enquiry to discover the truth, or if he did so, he completely ignored such matters in order to frame a negative untruthful story of his own in order to harm the Company and its shareholders.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine

And I don't buy the claim that HTQ knew they would never get a recovery permit because they attempted to bring up the cannon. It's just the opposite. They knew they would never get a recovery permit and they attempted to bring up the cannon without the BAR finding out.

SFRX pumped finding the cannon for all it was worth. A "professional" organization/person would tell folks the truth about what happened. Sinclair stated in his research design moving the cannon from its original location actually wasn't helpful.

If/when I get the updated and corrected latest research design I will post it. The last one the BAR sent was a copy/past from the previous one and what they linked wouldn't work.

https://www.scribd.com/document/355392040/2014-04-Final-Report-2017-Seafarer-s-Quest-MRP-Comments