InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,509.01
(
0.62%
)
US TECH 100
19,460.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,331.85
(
0.41%
)
Brent Oil
86.50
(
0.06%
)
Bitcoin
60,883.28
(
-1.84%
)
Post# of 144
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

236T568

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 123
Posts 44159
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 09/06/2012

236T568

Member Level

Re: Dina post# 135

Tuesday, 09/26/2017 7:04:36 PM

Tuesday, September 26, 2017 7:04:36 PM

Post# of 144
actually, sorry but doesn't count

"being in the process" of filing late financials when you are behind 8 10Q's and 10K's is not a good thing and fully deserves to be suspended by the SEC...



I have seen it.
The point is, NMED was in the process to file everything, and other stocks have no intention to file and are delinquent since 5 years +.

I would start to suspend the ones where company is gone and has no intention to file and i would give companies which changed the auditor recently or started to file already time.

If a company failed to file and tries to correct it, there is no point in suspending it anymore.

They give some companies years, and others sec destroys even if there are signs they will file. It makes no sense.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up