Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[loanranger]

Care to interpret?
"In particular the Federal judge must reach a decision, whether there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether (1) the DECN rationale of earlier patent amendments provided and accepted by the USPTO bore no more than a "tangential relationship" to the operation of the Lifescan's Accused Products; or (2) there is clear and convincing evidence that claim scope that would have covered Lifescan's accused products was surrendered."

I can't believe that that's his idea of a helpful explanation.