InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 2844
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/26/2013

Re: leifsmith post# 166866

Wednesday, 09/20/2017 5:44:08 PM

Wednesday, September 20, 2017 5:44:08 PM

Post# of 173236

" but that does not mean much right now, since we are in communication with the DOI regarding a proposal to redraw the borders that would reduce the size of the IFNM by about 25%."


This is the same pattern of using deceitful, misleading language to make suckers think something might be happening and milk them for a few more dollars.

I will send an email to the DOI with a proposal to expand Ironwood by 500%. They might respond back with a generic boilerplate response letter. BUT THEN I can claim I am in "communication" with the DOI regarding my proposal and scam idiots and suckers into thinking something might be really in the works.

UTTERLY MEANINGLESS!!!

I DARE LBSR TO MAKE ANY REPLIES FROM THE DOI PUBLIC. THERE IS NOTHING SECRET ABOUT THEM. GOVERNMENT FOI AND SUNSHINE LAWS. IF THEY DON'T, THEY ARE SCAMMING EVERYONE, AGAIN, AS ALWAYS!


-

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LBSR News