InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 859
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/04/2006

Re: Minding post# 7235

Wednesday, 09/20/2017 9:42:46 AM

Wednesday, September 20, 2017 9:42:46 AM

Post# of 10344
I never said they should have an answer in 60 days. I did however point out that it is a possibility. I also believe we will hear within the 90 day timeline. My reasoning is for a couple reasons.
1. The FDA is quite capable of approving traditional submissions in 60 to 90 days. case in point.


Also in latest presentation TN said they are in
Device Classification Name
system, imaging, pulsed echo, ultrasonic

[color=red]510(k) Number
K172142

Device Name
FibroScan 430 Mini+

Applicant

Echosens
30 place d'italie
paris, FR 75013


Applicant Contact
karine bonenfant

Correspondent

Boston MedTech Advisors Inc.
990 washington street
suite #204
dedham, MA 02026


Correspondent Contact
zvi ladin

Regulation Number
892.1560

Classification Product Code

IYO


Subsequent Product Code

ITX


Date Received
07/17/2017

Decision Date
09/13/2017

Decision
substantially equivalent (SESE)

Regulation Medical Specialty
Radiology

510k Review Panel
Radiology

Type
Traditional

Reviewed by Third Party
No

Combination Product
No
active review. This info combined with what I just recently posted
Substantive Review (including Substantive Interaction and Interactive Review)

During Substantive Review, the Lead Reviewer conducts a comprehensive review of the 510(k) submission and communicates with the submitter through a Substantive Interaction, which should occur within 60 calendar days of receipt of the 510(k) submission.

The Substantive Interaction communication is typically:
•an email stating that FDA will proceed to resolve any outstanding deficiencies via Interactive Review; or
•an Additional Information (AI) request which places the submission on hold.

Interactive Review

If the Lead Reviewer chooses to continue with an Interactive Review, this means the Lead Reviewer has determined that any outstanding deficiencies may be adequately addressed within the timeframe set by the Medical Device User Fee Amendment of 2012 (MDUFA III) performance goal for a 510(k) (90 FDA days) and that the submission will not be placed on hold. The Lead Reviewer communicates with the submitter during the Interactive Review using tools such as:
[/color]•Email
•Telephone Call


Tells me that FDA believes it will provide an answer within the 60-90 day window. Maybe you didn't see that post.
For the decision to talk the 9 months or more you referred to would mean they were on hold and not in active review as Dr. Norchi just stated.