InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/13/2017

Re: Jameseypoo post# 75172

Monday, 09/18/2017 4:53:04 PM

Monday, September 18, 2017 4:53:04 PM

Post# of 144814
After the $PMCB S-3 was filed I started looking into the reasons other pre-clinical biotechs filed S-3.

What I found was an interesting pattern. In two cases I found S-3s filed after a partnership was announced:

April 6, 2016: http://ir.tesarobio.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=963728
June 30, 2016: http://ir.tesarobio.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1047469-16-14088&CIK=1491576

May 18, 2016: http://ir.macrogenics.com/releasedetail.cfm?releaseid=971495
Nov 11, 2016: http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/AMDA-278VRP/5199416798x0xS1552781-16-2034/1125345/filing.pdf

And in one case I found an S-3 filed before a partnership was announced:

March 28, 2017: http://www.ligand.com/news-events/press-releases/detail/320/ligand-announces-licensing-partner-janssen-has-filed-an-ind
January 8, 2017: http://investor.ligand.com/all-sec-filings/content/0001193125-16-424831/0001193125-16-424831.pdf

Now S-3s are filed for various reasons of course, I just thought it was interesting as these are all biotechs.

It didn't take me very long to find these and I'm sure there must be dozens of other examples out there. Anyone know of other examples?




Know What You Own. My posts should not be construed as investment advice.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent PMCB News