Saturday, September 16, 2017 6:21:40 PM
This case has made me imagine/think that there is basically a whole area of "white collar" law wherein, to achieve prosecution of a guilty party requires a jury that's as educated and informed about the details of the crime (say, accounting) as the perpetrator is. And that is highly unlikely in some cases! Lacking that, the judge would have to be as informed and experienced as the perpetrator. I think there are many potential crimes that could never effectively be prosecuted because of this fact. One expert witness could simply refute any other expert witness, as often happens in court.
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM
Snakes & Lattes Opens Pop-Up Location at The Wellington Market in Toronto: A New Destination for Fun and Games - Thanks 'The Well', PepsiCo, Indie Pale House & All Sponsors & Partners for Their Commitment & Assistance Throughout The Process • FUNN • Jun 13, 2024 8:18 AM
HealthLynked Introduces Innovative Online Medical Record Request Form Using DocuSign • HLYK • Jun 12, 2024 8:00 AM
Ubiquitech Software Corp (OTC:UBQU) Posts $624,585 Quarterly Revenue - Largest Quarter Since 2018 • UBQU • Jun 11, 2024 10:13 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Files for OTCQB Uplisting, Provides Financial Update • ELEM • Jun 11, 2024 9:25 AM