InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 126
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/17/2017

Re: 1manband post# 33736

Thursday, 09/14/2017 3:13:42 PM

Thursday, September 14, 2017 3:13:42 PM

Post# of 35791
The sec action is completely unhelpful to anyone. I don't think any one holding the stock long or thinking about buying the stock was happy about the suspension. Those holding the stock wanted to see if he met the 9/22 promise, those wanting to buy wanted to bet on it.

Anyone who has owned the stock at any point delinquent can stop talking bc there was nothing different about now and whatever time period you held. When I bought a month ago he said sannabis spin off, China mine sales (even if from third party), and then said would file 9/22. So I figured I'd give him until exactly 9/22 to provide. The sec could've suspended when his auditor quit but they didn't, he answered them, and said 9/22 you'll have them. If they wanted to help investors, they would help entice him to file on that date audited financial, not entice him to not file and revoke the company. They could have said 9/22 or we suspend trading. The only way it makes sense to suspend now is if they had info we did not, but if they do they should provide that info. Otherwise a rational regular would give 10 more days

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.