Thursday, September 07, 2017 1:00:51 PM
I do not run interference. That is not my job. I post what i know or believe and if posts are made that are inaccurate i correct them. The DOE (for those of you who have dealt with them) are incredibly careful with any relationship status being discussed publically at the early stages. We know they have reviewed the initial test results and i can assure you they would not waste their time seeking additional testing if they were not satisfied. But this is just my opinion based on my own experience. Other people may very well have experience where the DOE has hated or lacked confidence in a technology and yet continued to spend time and money on it. I doubt it but of course anything is possible.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM