InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 89
Posts 14810
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/29/2002

Re: dozerman post# 18580

Saturday, 09/02/2017 10:47:09 PM

Saturday, September 02, 2017 10:47:09 PM

Post# of 54442
Dozerman, both sections 1 and 2 state that the dismissal would be w/o prejudce. So even if the judge didn't get involved, it still is recorded w/o prejudice. And that means the case is not totally dismissed but Plaintiff is able to re-litigate case.

So...I will concede, could be judge didn't get involved in final dismissal w/o prejudice. But the end result is the same.

If it's no. 1, then Rossi agreed that Truxmart had the right to relitigate the case.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WKSP News