InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 4142
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/11/2009

Re: jfburk post# 159500

Friday, 08/25/2017 3:44:04 PM

Friday, August 25, 2017 3:44:04 PM

Post# of 165854
That share issuance stuff could explain why they never could get rid of the CTO. They would have had to produce financial statements for the reporting periods listed in the varied CTO.

https://cto-iov.csa-acvm.ca/ArticleFile.asp?Instance=101&ID=5F50F5B8D4854650B0D762186ECD13C8

¶ 5 The Company has failed to file: 1. interim financial statements for the interim periods ended September 30, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, as required under Part 4 of National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations (NI 51-102) and section 5(b) of BCI 51-509, 2. comparative annual financial statements for its financial years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, as required under Part 4 of NI 51-102 and section 5(b) of BCI 51-509, 3. Form 51-102F1 Management's Discussion and Analysis for the periods ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008, March 31, 2009, June 30, 2009, September 30, 2009, December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, as required under Part 5 of NI 51-102 and section 5(b) of BCI 51-509, and ...