Magmar, I believed you missed the thrust of my entire message. Penny stock investors typically only purchase what they are comfortable losing. I'm truly sorry you were burned before. Losing money is never a good feeling, however, you tend to spend an inordinate amount of time posting about this company. You don't want to invest in this company. Fine. Move on.
You are adamant that you are right about this company (and you very well may be), however, some of your posts are flawed and exhibit a complete lack of bias.
After your comment about no love for the government, I made the point about Solyndra and the US government being the poster child for bad investments. You chose not to answer that. Instead, you directed me toward the hyperlink for Dr. Bauer's article. Please help me understand what I missed in his article. He doesn't mention a single company. Not one. He mentions many new patents and technologies behind filed. He concludes with, "It is often difficult to sort through competing claims and get to the gist of what differentiates the different technologies. The 76 consultants of Lee Enterprises have the skill and experience to help you with this task." Conveniently, Dr. Bauer works for Lee Enterprises. Are you serious?
I specifically said that their past claims leave little to be desired. They have done a remarkably poor job communicating. They've stated that they've tested with some of the biggest ethanol producers. If this is true and they've performed tests for Koch, Poet, Valero, whomever, than shareholders need to be made aware. Get the PR departments from those groups on board and release a joint statement. I hear you loud and clear on their lack of transparency and honesty.
With that, remove some of your bias. The USDA certainly does care where the check is coming from. See two paragraphs up--the US government makes bad decisions. INEOS was a bad decision. You think they wouldn't thoroughly vet the potential acquirer after making such a colossal mistake the first go around?
Do you think the City of Vero Beach would be onboard with this technology after getting burned before? Do you think Fast Company would write an article about it? Be rational for a moment....
CS & L out...
