InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2017

Re: 22na22 post# 26384

Wednesday, 08/23/2017 8:31:17 PM

Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:31:17 PM

Post# of 46511
Where did I say that? But if people would ACTUALLY READ THE 10Q there is NO MENTION OF SUCH a potentiality

THIS COMPANY IS PUBLIC SIR. If they are going to fund the NOTES IN DEFAULT IN SOME OTHER MANNER THEY ARE REQUIRED BY LAW TO DISCLOSE IT - IT IS NOT AN OVERSIGHT.

IF THEIR PLAN AT THIS STAGE WAS TO USE THAT ASSET TO FUND THE DEFAULT NOTES THEY HAVE TO BY LAW EXPLAIN TO SHAREHOLDERS THAT THEY MAY FUND THE NOTES IN DEFAULT WITH THAT SPECIFIC ASSET. THIS IS AN SEC REGULATION.

SHAREHOLDERS NEED TO BE NOTIFIED ABOUT THE INTENTION TO USE ASSETS TO ADDRESS LIABILITIES IN DEFAULT SIR, SPECIFICALLY HOW THEY WILL BE FUNDED, THIS IS A MATERIAL ISSUE GIVEN THE DEFAULT STATUS IRRESPECTIVE OF THE DOLLAR VALUE.


THE FACT THE COMPANY STATED TWO OPTIONS AND DID NOT STATE A THIRD THAT OTHERS SEEM TO BE HOPING FOR SUGGESTS BY LAW THAT THIRD OPTION PEOPLE ARE SUGGESTING IS NOT PLANNED BY THE COMPANY AT THIS STAGE -THAT IS A FACT.

While they can always change their STRATEGY TO FUND THE NOTES IN DEFAULT, based on their CURRENT LEGAL PUBLIC DISCLOSURES THEY ARE NOT PLANNING TO DO AS SUCH

THEREFORE, ANYONES SUGGESTING AS SUCH IS NOT LISTENING TO THE COMPANY ITSELF