InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 345
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/24/2014

Re: 22na22 post# 26242

Sunday, 08/20/2017 7:56:50 AM

Sunday, August 20, 2017 7:56:50 AM

Post# of 46488
22na22,

If you read the links and if you will go to Google and read USC 35 and I believe 32 and 31. It will help you decide for yourself what the answers are that you are searching for. These are a few references out of an additional 500 plus references.

https://www.scribd.com/document/212485072/Worlds-Inc-v-Activision-Decision

https://seekingalpha.com/article/2737675-worlds-expect-favorable-findings-from-the-markman-hearing

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/09/30/proper-112-indefiniteness-directed-claims/id=73342/

I would also encourage you to go on the web and look up the attorney for Worlds, connect the dots and you will know his strategy from start to finish. Also Kidrin has laid the strategy out as well.

I do not necessarily agree with Alpha except for this one fact. You must read, digest, connect the dots to get your answers. This is not an easy case to follow unless you are a brilliant patent lawyer with the wisdom of King Solomon. The facts and nuances will not be spoon fed to anyone. WDDD attorneys spent nine months before they decided to take the case. I spent hundreds of hours researching before I had my answers and placed my bet.

Happy Hunting