InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 367
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2015

Re: AlphaInvestor8 post# 26195

Friday, 08/18/2017 2:19:47 PM

Friday, August 18, 2017 2:19:47 PM

Post# of 46500
I'm still curious - do you know why patent 998's claims are not mentioned by that article/Kidrin? The 6 claims you mention as quoted by Kidrin seem to be the 6 claims from patents 558 and 690 (matches up perfectly and is also described in the article as the 6 claims from those two patents). THe 6 patents do NOT include the 8 claims validated by the PTAB on patent 998.

If you have any light on this, I'm still a bit confused on it. Thanks.

If you can with 100% certainty say the additional 8 claims from patent 998 are all simply replicates of the 6 claims on the other two patents, I'll believe you until I have enough time to fully read the PTAB rulings. But even in that case, there are an additional two claims on 998 missing.