Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[AlphaInvestor8]

See my last post - you have to understand the same verbiage and functionality on a different patent sure makes it a 'claim' but it does not make it independent

I have explained this in a previous post

1. If the CAFC kills say claim "x" on Patent 1

2. And the same verbiage and functionality is on Patent 2 but is called claim "y"

3. Does that make the claim 'different and independent' - no it does not, it makes it a different 'number' on the other patent - so on a semantics level you can count it as 'another claim getting through'.

4. Thus, you can count that as another claim but in legal actuality it is the SAME on patent 1 and patent 2, so it is really the 'same claim'.

5. Therefore if the CAFC kills it on patent 1 - it is gone on patent 2

people are double counting (from a legal perspective) here sir

I would suggest pulling up the patents and reading the claims that made it through

You will see there are only SIX claims that are functioanlly independent as a fact