Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[DDobserver]

I believe there is are two factors being forgotten.

The first is per the USC if a patent holder is disallowed from taking advantage of there patent due to clerical error by the USPTO the lost years are added on to the back end. So in Judge Caspers case she started the time at 2013. The years previous that she did not recognize and also because the USPTO admitted to making a clerical error will extend all the patents for many years to come. Please do not take my word for it go to the US Code and you will read the same words.

Also the WDDD patents are US patents so I am not sure if global sales will be applicable but certainly US sales will be included.