InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 68
Posts 9909
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/29/2007

Re: deal guy post# 37029

Tuesday, 08/15/2017 10:10:54 PM

Tuesday, August 15, 2017 10:10:54 PM

Post# of 68548
I found this. Conrad Lysiak, who was linked to dozens of other tickers that ended up being pump&dump scams and insider enrichment schemes, was the legal counsel for ECOS in 2114. He threatened to sue the SEC and FINRA for refusing to process the R/S. FINRA blocked the R/S because ECOS was selling toxic notes to people who had been indicted, sanctioned and fined by the SEC for Securities violations. ECOS had to get rid of all it's Asher (Curt Kramer) notes and to stop selling notes to him. FINRA finally processed the R/S, eight months after it had been approved by the Nevada SOS. With no source of income other than from selling toxic notes, ECOS was dead in the water and defaulted on it's debt.

Lysiak is no longer listed as ECOS's attorney and apparently the number of scams he was associated with have dropped to a hand full?

http://www.otcmarkets.com/research/service-provider/The-Law-Office-of-Conrad-C.-Lysiak-P.S.?id=5946&b=n&filterOn=3

"The magic word is, 'connected,'" said Conrad Lysiak with the Law Office of Conrad C. Lysiak PS in Spokane, Wash. "What does that mean exactly? Kramer (Asher) is not an officer, a director, a promoter, advisor or transfer agent. Does the company have a debtor-creditor relationship? Sure. But is he connected? Let me ask you this: What if ECOS had filed for a name change? Would FINRA be holding that up as well?"


Please help save the earth. It's our only source of chocolate.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.