Good points. I think you summed it up nicely. Very early on I liked the DK approach of bringing all the research, knowledge and experts into CRGS as the base to build on.
It's ironic that, as far as I can tell, the other fitbit type devices evolved from heartrate monitors. They might be hardware looking for a mission vs CRGS system which designed hardware to deal with the fatigue problem while incorporating decades of fatigue research. Cart and horse in the correct order.
Apple could become a kind of partner as they move into personal lifestyle spaces. They stopped being just a computer company with the iPhone and as they reach into other areas like cars and the home, this would be a good fit. Any Google, Microsoft, Apple or other megacompany would see the advantage of trying some sort of cooperative effort with tiny CRGS vs trying to duplicate all the effort and knowledge that CRGS has contracts with.
I don't remember Parker Hannifin, but I missed the last 2 stockholder meetings because of medical issues. One thing I do know is if you have arthritic shoulder problems, Ilya Voloshin is the man to see. Very happy with the results.
