Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[AlphaInvestor8]

ATVI DID NOT LOSE - THERE HAS BEEN NO RULING SIR STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION

YOU KEEP REPEATING MISINFORMATION HOPING OTHERS WILL NOT SEE THE PAST RESPONSES

THE DISTRICT COURT DID NOT RULE ON THIS CASE BECAUSE IT WAS STAYED. WHY ARE YOU REPEATING MISINFORMATION???

AGAIN 101 / ALICE IS NOT ONLY ABOUT CMB IT IS ABOUT OBVIOUSNESS/ABSTRACTION SIR - LEARN THE DIFFERENCE - YOU HAVE NO UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW SIR

REPEATING A MISINFORMED VIEW DOES NOT MAKE THAT VIEW CORRECCT

http://techrights.org/2017/07/23/software-patents-effectively-dead/

https://www.eff.org/cases/abstract-patent-litigation

GOOGLE IS YOUR FRIEND YOU CAN LEARN A GREAT DEAL IF YOU USE IT

YOUR VIEW OF 101/ALICE IS 100% INCORRECT AND SHOWS YOU HAVE NO COMPREHENSION OF THE REALITY OF THE RISKS HERE

101 /ALICE DOES NOT REQUIRE

1. COMBINATORY PATENTS

2. CBM PATENTS

101 IS A DEFINITION OF OBVIOUSNESS/ABTRACTION THAT IS WHAT IT ADDRESSES - THOSE TWO POINTS ABOVE ARE SIMPLY EXAMPLES OF WHAT FALLS UNDER 101 NOT WHAT DEFINES IT

LEARN THE DIFFERENCE