InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 813
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2017

Re: DataStream post# 25814

Saturday, 08/12/2017 12:38:26 AM

Saturday, August 12, 2017 12:38:26 AM

Post# of 46519
Your comments are COMPLETELY WRONG - and this is why listening to alternative views vs attacking people can actually help Educate people!!

wow

1. This statement below is 100% FALSE SIR - I suggest you learn about basic legal process

They ONLY will rule on the claims being challenged on appeal, that is the scope of their legal mandate, not a fishing expedition on patent validity. 101 cant be considered for invalidity as this is not a challenged position by Bungie and cannot by law be introduced unilaterally ad hoc by the CAFC.



A. FIRSTLY - AN APPEAL TO THE CAFC REVIEWS THE ENTIRE RULING - UNDERSTAND THAT NOT JUST THOSE CLAIMS LOST. IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO APPEALS, THE APPEAL IS ON THE RULING, THE RULING INCLUDES BOTH CLAIMS LOST AND INCLUDED. SO CLAIMS INCLUDED CAN BE KILLED THIS IS A FACT - YOU SHOULD CONTACT A LAWYER OR CALL THE CEO IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE ME. Do you really think Bungie will not address those claims that were held valid and argue they should not be? It is their chance at an appeal to, its not a game of I go first so you can't have a chance to argue what you want appealed.

B. 101 can be considered ' SUA SPONTE ' and this is exactly what happened to vringo v google . 101 was not addressed in the google defense filing and it was the Judge who raised it in oral arugments for Google - I would suggest you learn about that case and what sua sponte means.

C. Irrespective of the judge raising 101 on his own, ATVI raised this issue at the district court level - you better expect to be seeing it in their filings. As a defendant cannot raise this issue at the PTAB level they damn sure will throw it at the wall to see if it sticks with the CAFC.

2. This quote below again, shows a lack of legal understanding - this is 100% false as well

Worlds came through the IPR with 7 claims of the asserted claims against Activision intact, non of those claims have been challenged by Bungie and cannot be challenged at this point in time, Bungie can only respond to Worlds appeal brief on the challenged claims that the PTAB invalidated noting more, Period!



A. None of those claims have been challenged by Bungie? They haven't even filed their response yet, they asked for an extension, how do you know that? factually incorrect. They will for certain argue against the claims ruled valid - why would they not want the entire case thrown out? absurd comment.

B. Again an appeal REVIEWS AN ENTIRE RULING - INTACT CLAIMS AND CHALLENGED - They review ALL of the work that the PTAB or a lower court has ajudicated sir, you are not aware of legal basics. Again, Bungie will most certainly challenge the claims that held up.

I would suggest you call up Mr Kidrin or a lawyer if you cannot google this or do not believe me

I AM 100% CORRECT HERE YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG.


And this is EXACTLY WHY I BRING UP RISKS - MANY HERE HAVE NO CLUE AS TO THE REALITY OF THEIR RISKS AND YOUR POST HAS PROVEN THAT.

You are welcome, I just helped you a great deal even though you (and others) will likely be angry at me for it.