InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,567.19
(
1.06%
)
US TECH 100
19,846.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,375.87
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
85.79
(
-0.83%
)
Bitcoin
55,733.09
(
-0.20%
)
Post# of 31087
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

mariosmack

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 29
Posts 2417
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/09/2017

mariosmack

Re: Snizzle post# 12928

Friday, 08/11/2017 10:46:08 PM

Friday, August 11, 2017 10:46:08 PM

Post# of 31087
EXACTLY!!! The filings NEVER stated that Tempus had 100 million in contracts, and there is a reason why. They don't have 100 mil in contracts. GREAT POINT!!!!!!!!

I have been trying to say this for a long time. Just because Tempus paid prnewswire to mislead investors regarding these contracts does not mean that they have them. The paid prnewswire to craft the language such that investors would think that Tempus has already been given the entire contract and that they get all the money. They crafted the language without actually telling the lie.

But I agree on this. I also want to see the contracts written in the SEC filings, because without that, things are a bit too fishy.

99% of penny stocks are pump and dumps, yet 100% of penny stocks pretend to be in the 1%. Contracts, patents, mergers, partnerships, and other such news are usually "too good to be true" and should be looked at in detail. The source should also be vetted.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up