Wednesday, August 09, 2017 1:30:04 AM
The fact the case was stayed means a ruling was never entered or even likely written.
You have made an assumption that somehow the judge had a ruling ready and that because she didn't rule prior to the ptab process that this implies 101 is not an issue.
This is NOT correct in any manner from a legal perspective. The judge simply did not rule because the ptab process started prior and the case was stayed
Do not conflate two issues that are independent of each other.
Recent WDDD News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/12/2024 08:42:39 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/01/2024 01:27:19 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2024 08:16:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 08:47:52 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/15/2024 12:00:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/19/2023 09:30:21 PM
Alliance Creative Group (ACGX) Releases Q3 2024 Financial and Disclosure Report with an increase of over 100% in Net Income for 1st 9 months of 2024 vs 2023 • ACGX • Nov 14, 2024 8:30 AM
Unitronix Corp. Publishes Its Cryptocurrency Portfolio Strategy • UTRX • Nov 14, 2024 8:05 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Tech Form Joint Venture to Advance Early Disease Detection Using Artificial Intelligence • AVAI • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Swifty Global Announces Launch of Swifty Sports IE, Expanding Sports Betting and Casino Services in the Irish Market • DRCR • Nov 12, 2024 9:00 AM
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM