InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 2500
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2005

Re: jakedogman1 post# 307412

Monday, 08/07/2017 7:02:39 PM

Monday, August 07, 2017 7:02:39 PM

Post# of 345890
Jake, LOL! How many shares are enough?

Don't you think the underlying problem is that Ronin wants to win the power of shares they don't own by convincing parties to vote Ronin's preference without their needing to pay he price of establishing a 51% stake in the company? Ronin need only convince maybe 1000 investors like myself to align with them and they should be all set, right? If a 51% stake in the company is being attempted, I would expect to see the pps a lot higher than $4 and I might oblige Ronin interests by selling them mine. Message board anonymous chatter is a lot cheaper for parties to get control of PPHM than buying a majority stake if the retail investors can be persuaded to vote as if the acquiring party owned them, right? Of course, if Ronin is just plying for Avid value realization and the PPHM technology is really worthless, there wouldn't be much to post about, LOL! Long investors would just be holding out for Avid sale value to bump the pps up after the Avid customer sales get back on track, which could happen yet this year, maybe a year out, maybe longer.

Underlying Avid value when their annual sales climb above $100 million goes to $400 million shareholder value if a normal price to sales ratio for Pharma is applied and PPHM technology is valued at zero. And so on.... I posted on this topic before.

Best wishes and IMO.
KT
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News