InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 265
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2016

Re: int10a post# 47546

Thursday, 08/03/2017 2:08:06 PM

Thursday, August 03, 2017 2:08:06 PM

Post# of 47873
int10a - it looks like that massive document is looking to be decided on during the Aug 28th hearing (so it may not get any airplay today) so it looks like a play off between the independent trustees decision (if he/she decides against the executives claims) and the judge's possibly overruling. Not sure I really get
the exact play here but you can be sure it is pre-meditated and not in anyone's interest other than those that filed it. But that's sort of been the way things have been all along,right? AT LEAST WE CAN SAY NOW IT'S COMPLETELY TRANSPARENT AS FAR AS MOTIVE!!!

The requests within the doc are absurd..they've all been on vacation since Oct imho!
And a bonus for 2017...is that for meeting qtrly projections?! HAHAHAHA!

78+% said no thanks to furthering our investor /current leadership relationship...i know it hurts but it doesn't entitle them to put on the bad bart train robbers suit with bandanna covering their faces and declare " all you ladies and gentlemen kindly put your wallets and purses in the bag that we are currently passing around and the train will be back moving along shortly". They've received enough of our "money for nothing".

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.