InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 404
Posts 57916
Boards Moderated 16
Alias Born 05/01/2010

Re: Flynny post# 59220

Thursday, 07/27/2017 12:54:16 PM

Thursday, July 27, 2017 12:54:16 PM

Post# of 66405
Oh my, that article is certainly Not referring to MEXP/INOH, which has lived off P&Ds, had 3 Reverse splits, and tried for a fourth large reverse split of 1:1500, however FINRA would NOT approve the last one. Which by the way, that last RS was filed while there was NO bid, yet there was still INOH dilution from block positions. That was hardly for the good of the company.

The only update during that year was an INOH social media post that said updates coming which was accompanied by one of INOH's P&Ds. That created over 400 million in volume which was readily dumped into - INOH never gained a bid.

The next day's INOH volume? ONE million. Then followed by nothingness. Just a month later, INOH filed for a RS.

Obviously there have been a multitude of say nothing, go nowhere fluffy fabricated PR's for a decade under Goldberg, claiming "multi-millions" in revenue, always accompanied by one of their P&Ds - yet no "Millions" in revenue were ever realized, in fact NO INOH revenue was ever reported.

You say "do not automatically conclude that the issuance of new shares is always horrible".

Do tell, flynny, is it considered "automatically concluding" INOH is a P&D after watching it "issue shares" since 2012 repetitively promoting nonsense that is only dumped into?

More later....