InvestorsHub Logo

BKT

Followers 15
Posts 1009
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2007

BKT

Re: Protector post# 305747

Thursday, 07/27/2017 11:28:32 AM

Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:28:32 AM

Post# of 345989

CP

"Do we want that party in control of PPHM through 3 BoD members, the Broker Non-Vote control and an about 9% position?"

If you are asking my opinion, than hands down, I would take this party over the current 3 BOD members who have no skin in the game. I will let a 9-10% owner run the company since they would have an incentive to make us and them as much money as possible. I don't think I need to go in to the failures/mishaps and mistakes this current BOD have been involved with, on top of the two reverse splits and their excessive compensation.

I understand your concerns with replacement of current BOD, but if there is a choice I would take the Ronin group. After 15 years of failure, you don't get a free pass anymore. It's almost comical/ criminal these guys are still there. Can you imagine this BOD at any other legit company, do you honestly believe they would still be there.

In addition what does it say about our current BOD that if Ronin didn't buy over the last few months we would be pre split .30.

Any support for current BOD in my opinion is the same status quo. If these guys were truly legit, they would have cut their compensation years ago.

We will have to see if Ronin has the two guns to shoot the current board and win, I believe he may, but know there are a bunch of retail as well, who may have some small shooters to join him. It's a chess game at this time and I don't put to much confidence in this board's ability to think ahead so many moves.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News