InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/23/2010

Re: Jayyy post# 10030

Saturday, 07/22/2017 1:56:19 PM

Saturday, July 22, 2017 1:56:19 PM

Post# of 13735
In one short post there are 3 false statements:
1. "Not true"
My statements are are backed up by publicly verifiable information. Long ago I threw down the gauntlet daring anyone to challenge my statements with any factual information in an attempt to prove me wrong. It hasn't happened, the challenge remains.

2. "Rojas is an insider"
False by definition. He is a medical advisor. Not CEO, CFO, board member, or shareholder of 10% or more.

3. "Paid by this scam to promote the stock"
This is the most egregious of all the statements as it is false and defamatory toward Dr. Rojas, a "non public figure". He is paid as an advisor to the company, allowable under medical society rules. Further, conducting and presenting research on Sucanon trials is a scientific activity, not promotion of the stock. Medical device and drug companies have medical advisors routinely.
If one really wants to raise an issue with a medical person promoting a product or stock, look no further than Dr. Oz. He is on TV routinely promoting products without one iota of proof of efficacy, much less the "substantial clinical investigations" on Sucanon per FDA's own words. Once Dr. Oz is prosecuted then we can have a further discussion regarding the lack of understanding of medical ethics demonstrated by your comments.

Jacob J. Rosenblum on what every lawyer knows.

“If the facts are against you, hammer the law. If the law is against you, hammer the facts. If the fact and the law are against you, hammer opposing counsel."