InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,427.13
(
-2.31%
)
US TECH 100
18,600.00
(
-3.25%
)
Dow Jones
39,853.87
(
-1.25%
)
Brent Oil
80.41
(
-0.41%
)
Bitcoin
64,303.14
(
-1.64%
)
Post# of 61155
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

specutator

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 13525
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/19/2009

specutator

Re: A deleted message

Friday, 07/21/2017 3:32:19 PM

Friday, July 21, 2017 3:32:19 PM

Post# of 61155
I'm not the one needing new DD. It's easy to search all SEC rules, and the SEC abilities to suspend and halt the trading of issuers.

Wrong again like usual lol. Yawn zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Keep doing your DD

None of the rules follow any NT 10q/k through the rule 144 unless restrictive share(s) are being sold to the public.

DD is really easy.

So is the meaning of Rule 144 and the ability to verify violations of rule 144 if the claimant knows how to identify "dilution shares" to be within the restrictive share status instead of posting unverified text messages!

My posted comments are only my considered opinion based on the reality as I see it. Your reality may be different.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up