Decision Diagnostics Corp (DECN)

[CADguy57]

Again, the point is not about the resignation. The resignation is done and over with. What Mr. Lyons does now, i do not care about. The point is the inconsistencies in the letter. This doesn't look like it's the real letter/e-mail. No date of termination. No signature. Reversed e-mail addresses. Conflicting e-mail addresses. Just saying that on its surface, it looks suspect. Why they would do this, I don't know. But without a valid signature, it is absolutely invalid. I've spent enough time in court on contract disputes to know that. The only question I have is why an obviously fabricated e-mail? What do they gain? What's the risk/reward balance.