Fannie Mae (FNMA)

[bcde]

rek,

Thanks for your help to understand the legal nuances.

Our best bet would be to try everything possible from every possible angle and in as many different courts as possible. Somewhere FnF shareholders will find a Judge who will rule based on laws and facts using common sense and not just based on invented interpretations.

How can the word "may" have very different meanings in HERA? Defendants wants to interpret "may" as mandatory where ever it is convenient and optional where ever it is not convenient because using optional consistently violates the constitution.

Common sense interpretation of HERA and conservatorship based FIRREA would have solved these cases long time back without referring to constitution.

The Judges appointed and promoted through political process carry all the political baggage with them. And in FnF cases it is very blatantly visible. Judges have gone to extraordinary lengths to deny basic rights of FnF shareholders.